M.Mallika v. The Superintending Engineer And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

[ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** WPA/533/2023 M. Mallika Vs.

The Superintending Engineer and others Mr. S.Sasi Kumar ... for the petitioner Mr. Tulsi Lall Mr. Rakesh Kumar ... for the respondent March 22, 2023 [SR] Item No.3 The petitioner, who is an encroacher of a land, residing for long time, has applied for electricity connection on 14.02.2023, as appears from the annexure P-2 of the writ application. Such application was rejected by the Electricity Department, as appears from the page 14 to the writ petition. I do not find any reason for rejection of her application where remarks have been made that Court's order is required for giving the electric connection. This cannot be any reason for rejecting the application for electricity connection. Such rejection is set aside and quashed.

I direct the respondent No.3 to look after the matter and to intimate the petitioner the requisite fees that is to be paid by the petitioner to the Electricity Department within a period of two weeks.

The petitioner shall comply with the said order by two weeks thereafter. After compliance of the above formalities,

the respondent no.3 is directed to give supply of electricity to the petitioner within a period of four weeks thereafter. Enjoyment of electricity is a matter covered under Right to Life as has been enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and this cannot be denied even to an encroacher or to an illegal occupier.

This will not create any equity in favour of the petitioner in respect of the occupied land.

With the above observation and direction, this writ application, being WPA/533/2023, is disposed of. ( Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J. )