M.Joythi v. The Assistant Engineer

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

[ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] ...

WPA/722/2023 Smt. M. Joythi ... Petitioner Vs.

The Assistant Engineer ... Respondent Mr. K. Sabir ...for the Petitioner Mr. Tulsi Lall Mr. Rakesh Kumar ...for the Respondents August 18, 2023 (Bithika) Item No.19 An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved of being refused to grant electricity connection at the encroached premises of the petitioner disregarding the application dated 20.04.2023 filed before the respondent authority. The respondent authority had rejected the application of the petitioner dated 20.04.2023. Heard the submissions of learned Advocates of both the parties.

In view of the observation of the larger Bench of the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta in Abhimanyu Mazumdar Versus Superintending Engineer reported in 2011(2) CHN (Cal) 768, the respondent authority is directed to provide electricity connection to the petitioner within a period of three weeks from the date of communication of

this order upon due compliance of terms and conditions necessary for obtaining such electric connection being in possession of the premise for installation of electric meter without creating any proprietary interest upon the encroached property.

WPA No.722 of 2023 is disposed of.

The parties are to act upon the server copy of this order.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)