Shri. Snehamoy Dey v. The Andaman And Nicobar Administraion And ORS.

12-03-2026 Item No.1 PBD Subrata Bhattacharyya IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Circuit Bench at Port Blair Special Jurisdiction AR(C) Appellate Side (From the Principal Bench) WPCRC No.1 of 2026 in WPA 679 of 2024 Shri Snehamoy Dey -vsShri Thomas Vargheese Ms. G. Mini ...for the petitioner Ms. Babita Das ...for the contemnor 1.

Perused the affidavit of compliance filed on behalf of the contemnor. It appears therefrom that spot inspection was conducted in the presence of the petitioner who signed the attendance sheet with a rider that no boundary demarcation was made.

2.

The Court directed the Tahsildar to conduct spot inspection upon prior notice to all the necessary parties to ascertain and demarcate the land from where the petitioner's share can be identified. 3.

The spot inspection has been conducted. A report of spot inspection with specific finding as regards the share of the petitioner in the subject plot of land shall be formally communicated to the petitioner.

4.

It will be open for the petitioner to challenge the finding of the Tahsildar, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the same.

5.

There is no requirement of proceeding with the contempt application any further. The contempt application is disposed of. Contempt Rule stands

discharged.

6.

All parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

7.

Certified copy of this order, if applied for, shall be made available to the parties.

[Amrita Sinha, J]