Waman Madhaveo Dasmane, L.Rs. Madubai And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
2026:BHC-AUG:9269
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 609 OF 2026 Vinayak Ram Gugalgawe Died Through Lrs Smt. Laxmi W/o. Vinayak Gugalae And Anr.
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 605 OF 2026 Ashok Vithoba Kamble
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 607 OF 2026 Waman Madhaveo Dasmane, L.rs. Madubai And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 608 OF 2026 Vithoba Sadu Kamble, L.rs. Dattu Nilkanth Died Through Lrs Shobhabai And Others.
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 604 OF 2026 Narsing Mahadeo Deore
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 606 OF 2026 Madhavi Babu Kamble
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...
Mr. V. V. Ingale, Advocate for Appellants Mr. S. N. Morampalle, AGP for Respondents
CORAM
: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J DATE : MARCH 04, 2026 PC :
1.
Heard learned Counsels for both sides. Appeals are taken up for final disposal with consent of parties.
2.
Appellants are challenging common judgment and award dated 28.08.2008 passed by Reference Court granting compensation at the rate of Rs.4 per sq.ft.
3.
Mr. Ingale, learned Counsel for the Appellants, has placed on record a compilation of judgment rendered in LAR No. 994/2009, LAR No. 329/2016, letters of acquiescing, compensation awarded by Reference Court in collateral proceedings and order dated 16.12.2025 passed in First Appeal No. 2539/2021. It is submitted by learned Counsel for Appellants that they are also entitled to receive rate of Rs.20 per sq.ft on the ground of parity. 4.
The submissions are contested by Respondents. Learned AGP submits that there is no similarity of the lands and ground of parity is not attracted. It is further submitted that Appellants have failed to make out any case for enhancement and their appeals are liable to be dismissed. 5.
The lands are being acquired for rehabilitation of earthquake
affected persons at Salegaon, Tq. Umarga, Dist. Osmanabad. The lands are from village Kaldeo Limbala. They stood acquired by notification dated 24.02.1994. The rate offered by SLAO was Rs.20,000/- per hector, which is enhanced by the Reference Court to the tune of Rs.4 per sq. ft. 6.
The material particulars of the Appeals are as follows: Sr.
No F.A. No.
Name Lar No. & Date of Judgment Gat No area adm.
Notification U/s 4 Award U/s Compensation granted by SLAO Compensation granted by Reference Court FA 609/202 Vinayak Guglgawe (Died) Through Lrs LAR 430/2005 Dt.
28.08.2008 01H80R 24.02.1994 04.07.1996 Rs.20,000 per Rs.4/- per Sq Feet Hector FA 605/202 Ashok Kamble LAR 462/2005 Dt.
28.08.2008 01H33R 24.02.1994 04.07.1996 Rs.20,000 per Rs.4/- per Sq Feet Hector FA 606/202 Mahadevi Kamble LAR 325/2005 Dt.
28.08.2008 01H08R 24.02.1994 04.07.1996 Rs.20,000 per Rs.4/- per Sq Feet Hector FA 607/202 Waman Dasmane (Died) Through Lrs LAR 431/2005 Dt.
28.08.2008 01H45R 24.02.1994 04.07.1996 Rs.20,000 per Rs.4/- per Sq Feet Hector FA 608/202 Vithoba Kamble (Died) Through Lrs LAR 443/2005 Dt.
28.08.2008 00H48R & 01H62R 24.02.1994 04.07.1996 Rs.20,000 per Rs.4/- per Sq Feet Hector FA 604/202 Narsing Deore LAR 429/2005 Dt.
28.08.2008 01H62R 24.02.1994 04.07.1996 Rs.20,000 per Rs.4/- per Sq Feet Hector 7.
My attention is adverted by Learned Counsel to the judgments rendered by Reference Court in LAR No. 994/2009 as well as judgment
dated 01.01.2021 in LAR No. 329/2016. The lands in both matters were acquired for same purpose and Reference Court fixed the rate to the tune of Rs.20 per sq.ft. Interestingly, in both matters Respondent Acquiring Body acquiesced with the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, which is evident from the letter dated 09.01.2019 and 09.08.2021. 8.
This Court had occasion to adopt the rate fixed by the Reference Court in LAR No. 994/2019 in First Appeal No. 2539/2021. I find that Appeals are squarely covered by the view taken by this Court and the rate fixed by the Reference Court in collateral proceedings. 9.
This Court has to be consistent in fixing the rate and if the submissions of learned AGP are accepted, that would amount to discrimination. It is desirable to allow the First Appeals. Hence, I pass the following order:
ORDER
(a) First Appeals are partly allowed.
(b) Appellants shall be entitled to get receive rate at Rs.20/- per sq.ft.
(c) Appellants shall not be entitled to receive interest or statutory benefits for the delayed period.
(d) Appellants shall be entitled to receive interest under Sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act as per the judgment of Full Bench in case of State of Maharashtra vs. Kailash Shiva Rangari [2016 AIR (Bom.) 141]
(e) Save and except above, impugned judgment and award shall remain unaltered.
(f) Record and proceeding be sent back to the concerned Court and award be drawn accordingly.
(g) The Appellants shall pay the deficit court fees. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) Umesh