Gensiddha @ Guddu Bhimashankar Mhetre v. The State Of Maharashtra

Urmila Ingale 29-apeal-29-24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2024 Gensiddha @ Guddu Bhimashankar Mhetre ..Appellant VS.

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. V.V. Phatate, for the appellant.

Mr. A. R. Patil, APP for the State.

CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : JANUARY 15, 2024 P.C. :

1.

Shri Phatate, learned counsel for the appellant seeks discharge of his appearance in the matter as he is not receiving any instructions from the appellant. 2.

Advocate-Shri Phatate is discharged from appearing for the appellant.

3.

None for the appellant. The office note shows that non-bailable warrant has been issued and efforts are being made to trace the appellant. Since this is the appeal against the conviction, Admit.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) 1/1 Signed by: Urmila P. Ingale Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 16/01/2024 11:16:02