Smt. Ester Kantraj Naidu v. Rostin Kantraj Naidu And ORS.

9.IA.135.2024.doc by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date:

2025.08.22 11:44:31 +0530 ANANT KRISHNA NAIK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.25457 OF 2022 Smt. Esther Kantraj Naidu ...Applicant Vs.

Rostin Kantraj Naidu & Ors.

...Respondents

**** Adv. Hemant Ghadigaonkar for the Applicant.

Adv. S. A. Gawade for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 ****

CORAM

: M. M. SATHAYE, J.

DATED : 21st AUGUST 2025 P.C.:

1.

At the outset learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to amend the prayer clause. Leave is granted. Amendment to be carried out during the course of the day.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant and learned Counsel for the private Respondents.

3.

The Application is filed for condonation of delay of 147 days in filing the Appeal. No reply is filed opposing delay. 4.

Considering the extent of delay and averments in the Application, sufficient cause is made out. Application is allowed. Delay is condoned. (M. M. SATHAYE, J.) akn 1/1