Parbati Bairagi Gyadal v. Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika Through The General Manager, Mumbai

P.H. Jayani 28 IA2109.2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2109 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 27227 OF 2022 Parbati Bairagi Gyadal .... Applicant V/s.

Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika, Mumbai .... Respondent Mr. T.J. Mendon a/w. Mr. T.R. Kale for the Applicant. CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.

DATED : 08th MAY, 2025 P.C. :- .

Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant.

2) Present Application filed by the Original Claimant seeking condonation of 142 days delay in filing the aforesaid Appeal. 3) Record indicates that the Respondent-MCGM is duly served but no appearance is filed.

4) Mr. Mendon, learned Advocate for the Applicant submitted that due to financial difficulties, the Applicant could not file the Appeal in time. The deceased was unmarried son of the Applicant. However, just compensation is denied to the Applicant.

5) The delay is not huge. The Applicant has not taken any advantage on account of the said delay. In view thereof and for the other reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 142 days in filing the aforesaid Appeal, is condoned. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and stands disposed of. Appeal be registered forthwith. Digitally signed by PREETI HEERO JAYANI Date:

2025.05.10 17:26:05 +0530 PREETI HEERO JAYANI (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) 1/1