Bombay High CourtAPL/1423/2025disposed off as a withdrawn

Dr. Sau. Nanda Rajendra Vaidya v. The State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Ballarpur Tah.Ballarpur Dist.Chandrapur And Another

2025-09-25Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke1 pages

1 cr. wp 343.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 343 OF 2022 [Dr. Sau. Nanda Rajendra Vaidya vs. The State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., P.S. Ballarsha, Tah. Ballarpur, Dist. Chandrapur and anr.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------ - - - Mr. K. R. Bhise, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. S. Doifode, APP for the State/respondent no. 1 CORAM: ANIL L. PANSARE AND SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, JJ.

DATED : 25-09-2025.

Heard.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor makes a statement that the charge-sheet is filed and cognizance is taken. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as well as under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Once the cognizance has been taken, the remedy of filing writ petition under Article 226 is not available to the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is treated as an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In view thereof, Registry shall place the application before the appropriate Bench.

(S. S. THOMBRE, J.) (A. L. PANSARE, J.) wasnik Signed by: Mr. A. Y. Wasnik Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 26/09/2025 10:34:20