Farukh Ahmed Mohammad Safi Shaikh v. The States Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary
Digitally signed by PRASHANT VILAS RANE Date:
2025.12.06 18:19:38 +0530 39WP4683-24GRP.DOC PRASHANT VILAS RANE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4683 of 2024 Ganga Appa Mhaskar Thr. GPA Holder Santosh Appa Mhaskar.
...Petitioners
VS The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4678 OF 2024 Farukh Ahmed Mohammad Safi Shaikh
...Petitioners
Versus
The States Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4669 OF 2024 Varun Dilip Halde
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4671 OF 2024 Ramchandra Sadashiv Pilankar
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4670 OF 2024 Anita Anand Ghume
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4674 OF 2024 Anant Pandurang Teli
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary
...Respondents
P. V. Rane
39WP4683-24GRP.DOC __________ Mr. Divyesh K. Jain i/b. Nitin Gawre Patil, for Petitioners in all matters. Ms. Geeta R. Shastry, for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in WP 4669/24. Mr. Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy) with Ms. Ashwini Jadhav & Ms. Dipti Thorat, for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in WP 4670/24, WP 4683/24, WPL 4674/24 & WP 4678/24.
Mr. Anoshak Daver with Mr. Kevin Pereira, Mr. Viraj Jadhav i/b. Chinmaya Acharya for Respondent No.6 in all matters.
Ms. Manisha Gawde, AGP for State in WP 4683/24. Ms. Poonam Mital, AGP for the State in WP 4678/24 & 4674/24. Ms. Vrushali with Kabre, AGP for Stae in WP 4669/24. Mr. Prashant Kamble, AGP for the State in WP 4671/24. Mr. Manish with Upadhye, AGP for the State in WP 4670/24. __________
CORAM:
G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.
DATE:
03 DECEMBER 2025.
P.C.
1.
Mr. Daver, learned Counsel for respondent No.6 - developer informs that his clients are ready and willing to deposit all the cheques of the outstanding transit rent payable to the petitioners. He states that the cheques have also been brought to the Court. Let the same be handed over to the Advocate for the petitioners. He also states that in respect of any deficit or any of the petitioner remained unpaid, the same would be made good by his clients. The statement is accepted. The amounts be accepted by the petitioners without prejudice to their rights and contentions. Accordingly, we adjourn the proceedings to 8 December 2025.(HOB) (AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) P. V. Rane