Farukh Ahmed Mohammad Safi Shaikh v. The States Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary

21 WP 4683-24.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2025.12.09 15:59:36 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 4683 OF 2024 Ganga Appa Mhaskar Through GPA holder Santosh Appa Mhaskar & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4678 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4669 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4671 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3091 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4671 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4670 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4674 OF 2024 _______ Mr. Dinesh K. Jain for Petitioner.

Ms. Manisha Gawade, AGP for the State in WP/4683/2024. Ms. Vrushali Kabre, AGP for the State in WP/4669/2024. Mr. Manish Upadhye, AGP for the State in WP/4674/2024. Mr. Jagdish Aradwad (Reddy) for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in WP/4670/2024, WP/4683/2024, WP/4674/2024/ WP/4678/24 & WP/4671 of 2024. Mr. Anoshak Daver a/w Kevin Pereira i/b. Chinmay Acharya for Respondent No.6. _______

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.

DATE:

8thDECEMBER 2025 Laxmi

21 WP 4683-24.DOC P.C.

1.

Let a comprehensive chart be prepared in respect of the issues pertaining to each of the Petitioners. We are informed that three of the Petitioners were entitled to receive amounts towards transit rent. 2.

Mr. Daver, learned Counsel for Respondent No.6, on instructions, submits that the entitlement of some of these Petitioners to receive transit rent is disputed on behalf of his client. We shall hear the parties on this issue on the next adjourned date of hearing.

3.

Stand over to 10th December 2025.

(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Laxmi