India Infoline Finance Limited v. Irfan Ahmed And ANR.

1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION 30 N/262/2025 In EXA/374/2021 NEO GROWTH CREDIT PVT LTD VS TISHA ENTERPRISES3 AND 2 ORS WITH 31 N/264/2025 In EXA/457/2021 INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LIMITED VS IRFAN AHMED AND ANR.

WITH 32 N/266/2025 In EXA/456/2021 INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LTD.

VS ASLAM AKBAR SHAIKH (BORROWER) AND 2 ORS.

None for the Applicant.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 5th FEBRUARY, 2026 P.C. :- 1) None appears for the applicant when the matters are called out.

2) These Notices are filed under the provisions of Order XXI,

2/3 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in the year 2025. 3) From the proceedings, it can be gathered that the appointment of the sole arbitrator was unilateral. 4) I have taken a view in the judgment of L & T Finance Ltd. vs. Sangeeta Bhansali & Anr. in Commercial Execution Application (L) No. 5277 of 2022, considering the latest judgment of the Supreme Court decided on 5 January, 2026, in the matter of Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. and others vs. Airport Authority of India, Civil Appeal No. 37-38 of 2026, wherein it has been held that even at the stage of execution, arbitral awards can be set aside being void-ab-initio on the grounds that the appointment of the arbitrator was unilateral.

5) In view of the aforesaid judgment, the arbitral award in the present proceeding passed by the sole arbitrator is hereby declared to be non-est in law, non-executable and void-ab-initio. 6) Execution Application stands dismissed.

7) In sequel, Notices & the Interim Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

8) It shall be open for the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law.

9) As far as limitation is concerned, the period from the

3/3 invocation of the arbitration till today shall stand excluded for the purpose of initiating fresh arbitration proceedings. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)