Gautam Kisan Kedari v. Appropriate Rural Technology Institute And ANR

19.WP.83.2024.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.83 OF 2024 Gautam Kisan Kedari .. Petitioner

Versus

Appropriate Rural technology Institute (ARTI) & Anr .. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Sushan Mhatre, appointed Advocate for Petitioner.  Ms. T.J. Kapre, AGP for Respondent No.2 - State. ....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JUNE 12, 2025.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Mhatre, learned appointed Advocate for Petitioner and Ms. Kapre, learned AGP for Respondent No.2 - State. 2.

Arguments on behalf of learned Advocate for Petitioner and learned AGP have been heard.

3.

None appears for Respondent No.1, though served. Respondent No.1 was also absent on 19.03.2025 and 30.04.2025. Record indicates that Respondent No.1 has been served as far as back in April 2025 as per the Bailiff Report. Learned Advocate for Petitioner is appointed through legal Aid.

4.

List the matter on 26th June 2025. To be placed under the caption "For passing Orders".

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.06.13 10:49:26 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE