Hanumant Laxman Parade v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary And ORS

904-WP-258-2025-(C).odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 258 OF 2025 Hanumant Laxman Parade

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

Ms. Ankita Salvi i/by Mr. Rajaram Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2/State. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

by SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE Date:

2025.05.09 14:16:23 +0530 SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE DATE : 8th MAY, 2025 P.C. :- 1.

The proposal forwarded by the Management dated 3rd October, 2022, received by Respondent No.2 on 3rd October, 2022, is said to be pending. The learned AGP submits that he does not have instructions as to whether the proposal is decided or not. He submits that if it is still pending, it will be decided within a period of eight weeks from today.

2.

In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off. SUNNY THOTE

904-WP-258-2025-(C).odt 3.

We direct Respondent No.2, that if the proposal is still pending, all objections to the proposal shall be raised within a period of 15 days from today and shall be communicated to the Management on its E-mail address. The Management shall remove the deficiencies/cure the objections, within a further period of 30 days and re-submit the proposal. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 would decide the revised proposal on its own merits within a period 30 days. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion as regards the merits of the proposal.

4.

If the proposal is rejected, the aggrieved party is at liberty to avail of a remedy, as is permissible in law. If the proposal is accepted, steps for grant of Shalarth-ID shall be expeditiously undertaken.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) SUNNY THOTE