Palwe Shivdas Janardhan v. The State Of Maharashtra School Education Dept And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 289 OF 2025 Palwe Shivdas Janardhan

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

Ms. Ankita Salvi i/by Mr. Rajaram Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Ms. Reena A. Salunkhe, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2/State. Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

by SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE Date:

2025.05.09 14:16:23 +0530 SUNNY ANKUSHRAO THOTE DATE : 8th MAY, 2025 P.C. :- 1.

Leave to add the Employer as Respondent No.5. Addition be carried out forthwith.

2.

Since an innocuous prayer was made in this Petition, and since Mr. Kulkarni is on the Panel of the Advocates for the Municipal Corporation, we requested him to assist the Court. It was on this request that he has appeared in this matter.

3.

The proposal forwarded by the Management dated 1st October, 2020, received by Respondent No.2 on 1st October, 2020, is said to be pending. The learned AGP submits that she does not have instructions as to whether the proposal is decided or not. She submits that if it is still pending, it will be decided within a period of eight weeks from today.

4.

We direct Respondent No.2, that if the proposal is still pending, all objections to the proposal shall be raised within a period of 15 days from today and shall be communicated to the Management on its E-mail address. The Management shall remove the deficiencies/cure the objections, within a further period of 30 days and re-submit the proposal. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 would decide the revised proposal on its own merits within a period 30 days. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion as regards the merits of the proposal.

5.

If the proposal is rejected, the aggrieved party is at liberty to avail of a remedy, as is permissible in law. If the proposal is accepted, steps for grant of Shalarth-ID shall be expeditiously undertaken.

6.

In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)