Yogesh So Bharat Phatangare v. State Of Maharashtra
Trupti 1 15-wp-666-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 666 OF 2024 Yogesh s/o. Bharat Phatangare ...
Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents .......
Mr.Shubham Gurav i/b. Talekar and Associates for the Petitioner. Mr.B.V.Samant, Addl. GP with Ms.R.A.Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent -State.
.......
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M.SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 23 JANUARY 2024 P.C.:
This petition is filed making grievance regarding communication issued six years ago. In the petition, it is stated that TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE there is no delay in filing the petition when obviously on the face of TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2024.01.31 15:28:29 +0530 it there is. For the delay should not be considered as latches an explanation will have to be given.
2.
At this stage, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks time to file additional affidavit placing on record as to why the petition should not be considered as barred by latches.
Trupti 2 15-wp-666-2024.doc 3.
Stand over to 14 March 2024.
4.
Additional affidavit to be filed before the next date. (M.M.SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)