Jaywant Parshuram Naik v. The State Of Maharashtra Throu. The Sec. Urban Development Dept And ORS

923-ASWP-834-2024.DOC Arun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 834 OF 2024 Jaywant Parshuram Naik

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary Urban Development Department & Ors

...Respondents

Mr Arshad Shaikh, Senior Advocate, with Ranjit Agashe, Devansh Malhotra, Vinsha Acharya, Nikhil Sonar & Rajendra Jain, i/b Pankaj Thatte, for the Petitioner.

Mr KB Dighe, Addl GP, with Savina R Crasto, AGP, for Respondents Nos 1 to 5-State.

CORAM

G.S. Patel & Kamal Khata, JJ.

DATED:

2nd April 2024 PC:- 1.

We are told that while the 7th Respondent, a private ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Respondent has been served, Respondents Nos 8 and 9 have refused service. Both are in Mumbai. The Registry will issue fresh notice ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2024.04.02 19:37:48 +0530 and effect hand delivery on Respondents Nos 8 and 9, returnable on 17th April 2024. The notice will be accompanied by a copy of this order. The parties will be informed that if they do not accept service and do not remain present on the next date, an order may be passed in their absence apart from steps being taken to compel their attendance.

2nd April 2024

923-ASWP-834-2024.DOC 2.

The 7th Respondent though served is absent.

3.

The 6th Respondent is the Sarpanch of Village Nagaon, Alibaug. He has also been served. He will need to arrange representation by the next date.

4.

List the matter on 17th April 2024.

(Kamal Khata, J) (G. S. Patel, J) 2nd April 2024