Madhuri Ramesh Bhamre v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary Development Dept And Others

- 1 - wp1062.24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 932 WRIT PETITION NO. 1062 OF 2024 Madhuri Ramesh Bhamre ....Petitioner

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra & others .....Respondents .....

Mr. G. K. Kshirsagar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for the State.

WITH 943 WRIT PETITION NO. 5568 OF 2024 Vidya Shivajirao Dhamane ....Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others .....Respondents .....

Mr. G. K. Kshirsagar., Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for the State.

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 6th MARCH, 2025.

PER COURT :

1.

None for Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, inspite of service of notice. Hence, petitions to proceed ex-parte against Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad.

- 2 - wp1062.24.odt 2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that even before imposing minor penalty, issuance of notice to the petitioner is contemplated by Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Discipline and Appeal Rules. It is his submission that no notice was issued. 3.

In view of this submission, it is necessary that Zilla Parishad produces the relevant record in which the impugned order came to be passed. Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad to produce record before this Court for perusal. Since none has appeared on behalf of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, Registry to intimate this order to CEO, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. File be produced before this Court on or before the next date of hearing.

4.

Stand over to 21.03.2025.

5.

It is clarified that if the file is not produced before this Court, the CEO, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, shall be held personally responsible for the same.

( R. M. JOSHI) Judge dyb