← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1550/2024disposed off

The Maharashtra Advocates Clerks Association Sangli Thr Its Director v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Dept Of Law And Judiciary And ANR

2026-06-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande2 pages

27. CIVIL WP-1550-24.odt Amberkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1550 OF 2024 The Maharashtra Advocates' Clerks Association, Sangli .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Prajakt M. Arjunwadkar a/w Mr. Dhananjay A. Utture, Mr. Chinar S. Sankpal, Mr. Ritesh R. Raut a/w Mr. Ganesh S Farakate, Advocates for Petitioners  Ms. N.S. Bhide, GP with Mr. B.V. Samant, Addl. GP & Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for State ...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV & NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 15, 2026 P. C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Arjunwadkar, learned Advocate for Petitioners and Ms. Bhide, learned GP a/w Mr. Samant, learned GP and Mr. Mali, learned AGP for State.

2.

After hearing Mr. Arjunwadkar for quite sometime and expressing our mind to him, Mr. Arjunwadkar persuades the Court to pass appropriate directions to consider the Writ Petition as Representation to the State and determine the same strictly in accordance with law.

3.

Without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, Writ Petition will be considered as a representation by Law and Judiciary

27. CIVIL WP-1550-24.odt Department, State of Maharashtra strictly in accordance with law. If required, hearing be given to the representatives of Petitioner's Association and appropriate orders be passed in accordance with law. Needless to state that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of Petitioner's case at all.

4.

Writ Petition is disposed.

[ NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J. ] [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Amberkar