Rubab Buransaheb Inamdar v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. The Secretary Planning Department And ORS

10. WP 7300.24.doc JPP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7300 OF 2024 Rubab Buransaheb Inamdar ... Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

... Respondents Mr. Y.B. Lengare for the Petitioner Ms. Aparna D. Vhatkar for the Respondent No.10 Mr. Vikas M. Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 9 CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

DATE : 02 JULY 2024 P.C. :- The Petitioner has directly approached with the writ of mandamus to Respondent Nos. 4 to 9 to consider the services of the Petitioner from initial date of appointment. The Petitioner will have to first approach the Respondent Nos. 4 to 9 with the said prayer so that the Respondent Nos. 4 to 9 can have an opportunity to examine and take corrective steps if the Petitioner is entitled to or if the Petitioner is not entitled to, then pass a reasoned order. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner will apply to Respondent Nos. 4 to 9 with the prayers in this Petition. The

10. WP 7300.24.doc Respondent Nos. 4 to 9 will consider the representation on its own merits and pass suitable order thereupon. We keep the question of delay open. If the representation is made within a period of three weeks, the same will be decided within a period of four weeks thereafter, subject to other time bound commitments. M.M. SATHAYE, J.

NITIN JAMDAR, J.

by JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR Date: 2024.07.05 10:27:56 +0530 JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR