Ms. Aaradhana Rajkumar Mandlik v. Mrs. Shashikala Sunil Magar

Megha 904_wp_10841_2024.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10841 OF 2024 Ms Aaradhna Rajkumar Mandlik

...Petitioner

V/s.

Mrs. Shashikala Sunil Magar

...Respondents

____________________________________________________________ None for the Petitioner.

Mr. Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy) for the Respondents. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

Dated : 9 August 2024.

P.C. :

1) When the Petition appeared before the Court on 7 August 2024 following order was passed:- The Petition is listed at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for Respondent on a complaint that pendency of the Petition is being used for the purpose of seeking repeated adjournments before the Trial Court. It appears that the Petition has not been moved even once till date. It appears that Petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the Petitioner. However, by last chance, list the Petition under caption 'for dismissal' on 9 August 2024.

2) Today, none appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. It appears that Petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the Petition. MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB 3) Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB Date: 2024.08.14 14:18:53 +0530 [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No.

1 of 9 August 2024