← Library
Bombay High CourtAO/71/2024rejected for not removing office objections

Saifuddin Dawoodbhai Lakdawala Son Of Late Dawoodbhai M. Lakdawala And Another v. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (Mmrda) Thr. Its Metropolitan Commissioner And ORS

2024-02-29Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl Ii)2 pages

Digitally signed by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date:

2024.03.01 15:47:17 +0530 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Chitra Sonawane. 1 41-AO-71-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal from Order No.71 of 2024 a/w Interim Application No.667 of 2024 in Appeal from Order No.71 of 2024 a/w Interim Application No.667 of 2024 in Appeal from Order No.71 of 2024 Saifuddin D. Lakdawala ....

Appellant.

Vs.

MMARDA & Ors ....

Respondents.

Mr Raj Awasthi i/by Pragya Mishra for appellant. Ms PM Bhansali for MMRDA for respondent No.1. Mr Kiran Shinde, AGP for respondent.

Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.

Date : 29 February 2024.

P.C. :

Interim Application No.668 of 2024 For reasons stated in the application and no objection from the other side, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads thus;

(a) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the appellants to carry out amendment

Chitra Sonawane. 2 41-AO-71-2024.doc in the memo of the Appeal from Order (St) No.33428 of 2023 and Interim Application (St) No.33429 of 2023 (for stay) moved therein as per 'Schedule-A' appended hereto." 2.

Necessary amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. After amendment is carried out issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 28 March 2024.

3.

List the appeal on 28 March 2024.

[ R. N. Laddha, J. ]