Arpita Rajput v. Avinash Kumar Rastogi

Digitally signed by RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL Date:

2026.02.09 16:41:57 +0530 RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL 1/2 3 FCA.22.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1381 OF 2024 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2024 Arpita Rajput ..

Appellant

Versus

Avinash Kumar Rastogi ..

Respondents ...

Mr. Virendra Pethe, for the Appellant.

...

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED : 06th FEBRUARY, 2026 P.C:- 1.

In continuation of our previous order dated 03.02.2026, we have taken note of the consent terms and also made reference to paragraph 5 thereof, wherein the parties agreed that the marriage solemnized between the couple on 11.07.2016 be dissolved by mutual consent of both the parties. 2.

Since the consent terms are filed before the Family Court at Thane, in Petition No.E/9/2023, which have set out the terms of settlement, and the said consent terms have not been presented to us, considering that we are seized of the Appeal, which is continuation of the proceedings before the Family Court at Thane, we expect the parties to file consent terms Rushikesh

2/2 3 FCA.22.2024.odt before us if they expect the divorce decree to be passed in accordance with the consent terms.

List the Appeal on 13.02.2026, on the Supplementary Board.

(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Rushikesh