← Library
Bombay High CourtFCA/29/2024allowed

Vijaya Suryakant Velankar Nee Vijaya Prabhakar Karmarkar v. Suryakant Madhusudan Velankar

2024-11-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil , Hon'Ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere1 pages

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 12/11/2024 None Present The office remark shows that notice issued to sole respondent on 31.07.2024 is returned with Bailiff's remark dt. 05.10.2024 "At the time of service, the sole respondent was not found and his house was locked. On inquiry, it was informed that sole respondent is presently residing at Pune but seldomly visits the given address. Therefore, as per Hon'ble Court's order, notices were pasted on the conspicuous part of the doors". The report below notice is on the affidavit of concerned bailiff.

Hence, service of notice upon sole respondent be treated as good service vide Order V Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II) sat-R(J-II)-12.11.2024