Rajendra Bhaurao Gaikwad v. The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corportion And ORS

vc-2-1-9216-2021.doc Nikita

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date:

2025.10.10 18:47:14 +0530 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.2 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9216 OF 2021 Rajendra Bhaurao Gaikwad

...Petitioner

versus The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and Ors. ...Respondents .....

Mr. Rajeshwar Panchal (through V. C.) for the Petitioner. Mr. Deepak More (through V. C.) a/w Mr. Sangramsinh Yadav for the Respondent No.1.

.....

CORAM : M.S. KARNIK & S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2025.

P.C:

1.

Heard Mr. Panchal, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. More for the Respondent No.1.

2.

Our attention is invited to the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal No.2028 of 2023 dated 6th February, 2023 which reads as under:

"

Upon our expressing reservations in entertaining this petition, particularly when the contention with reference to Rule 4(2) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1982 does not appear to have as such been urged before the High Court, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per his instructions, such ground had specifically been taken

vc-2-1-9216-2021.doc before the High Court and was indeed urged.

With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission for the petitioner to withdraw with liberty to file a review petition before the High Court and to approach this Court over again in case occasion so arises.

Permission granted.

This special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed."

3.

Having heard Mr. Panchal, we see no error apparent on the face of the record in the order to warrant interference in exercise of our review jurisdiction.

4.

The review petition is dismissed.

[S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.] [M.S. KARNIK, J.]