← Library
Bombay High CourtRPW/98/2024disposed off

The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Seceretary General Administration Department v. Vinayak Dattatraya Ghaisas

2025-04-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar2 pages

PSL 2-RPW-98-2024 .doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 98 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 51 OF 2021 The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Petitioners

V/s.

Vinayak Dattatraya Ghaisas & 136 Others

...Respondents

Mr. Siddheshwar Kalel, A.G.P. for Petitioners.

CORAM

:

A. S. GADKARI & N. R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

2nd April, 2025.

P.C. :

1) This review petition is preferred by the State seeking review Order dated 16th September, 2021.

2) Perusal of Order dated 16th September, 2021 clearly indicates that, it is passed by following the decisions in field rendered by various Division Benches of this Court, in the Petitions mentioned in para Nos. 5 and 7 therein.

3) Record indicates that the State had preferred Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary Nos. 4882/2025, 4885/2025, 4891/2025, 4881/2025, 4875/2025, 293/2025, 3596/2025, 3610/2025, 3613/2025, 3741/2025, 1/2

PSL 2-RPW-98-2024 .doc 4874/2025, 4877/2025, 4878/2025, 4880/2025, 4886/2025, 4887/2025, 4888/2025, 4893/2025, 5469/2025, 5471/2025, 5479/2025, 5482/2025, 3738/2025, 3595/2025, 3742/2025, 5470/2025, 298/2025 & 4898/2025 against similar Orders before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its Order dated 3rd March, 2025 has dismissed the said Special Leave Petitions by holding that there is no reason to interfere with the impugned Orders therein. It is thus clear that, the view adopted by this Court in the Order under review dated 16th September, 2021 has already been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its Order dated 3rd March, 2025.

4) After hearing the learned A.G.P. and perusing entire record, we are of the considered view that there is no error apparent on the face of record. In view thereof, we find that there are no merits in the Petition and it is accordingly dismissed.

(N.R.BORKAR, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2