Mr Namdev Dhondiram Yadav (Since Deceased) Thru. Lrs Mr Arun Namdev Yadav v. Mr Vidyadhar Shankarrao Sarnaik (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Meena Vidyadhar Sarnaik And ORS

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.16 OF 2024 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.688 OF 2016 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders CORAM : S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL. - II) DATE : 22nd July, 2024 Advocate Amit Jaiswar i/b. Advocate Manoj M. Gadkari Present for Applicant.

The above numbered Interim Application in Civil Revision Application is listed on board of Registrar for third time. Already four weeks time has been granted, however, despite granting four weeks time, Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps against unserved proposed Respondent No.1(B).

Here reference to Chapter VII Rule 6 Sub rule 1 and 2 of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960 (for short "Rules") may be conveniently made. It states about Processes, Process fees, Printing Charges, Security for costs and other procedure after admission etc.

In view of provisions under chapter VII Rule 6(1) (e), immediately after the expiry of the period prescribed under the forgoing sub-rule of this rule for taking the requisite steps for the issue of fresh notice or for supplying postal stamps to cover the postal and registration charges, the office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which steps have not been taken for the issue fresh notices or the postal stamps to cover the postal and registration charges have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss the matter for failure to prosecute.

As such, the prescribed time to take steps against unserved proposed Respondent No.1(B) as provided under Rules 1960 has been expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to take steps against unserved proposed Respondent No.1(B).

In turn, 02 (two) weeks time is granted with directions to take steps against unserved proposed Respondent No.1(B) without fail. On failure, Interim Application in Civil Revision Application would stand

dismissed against unserved proposed Respondent No.1(B) without further reference to the court of Registrar.

sd/- Registrar (Judl. - II) dsm