← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/675/2025disposed off

Hetal Vishnubhai Shah And Others v. Sunanda Parshuram Shinde And Others

2025-12-02Hon'Ble Justice Kamal Khata3 pages

Sumedh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.396 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.675 OF 2025 Hetal Vishnubhai Shah & Ors.

... Appellants V/s.

Sunanda Parshuram Shinde & Ors.

... Respondents _______________________ Mr. Foram Nikhil Chauhan a/w. Adv. Dikshant P. Dudhane i/by Adv. Sanket Shah for the Appellants.

Mr. Ganesh Mirastigaonkar for Respondent Nos.6 and 8. Mr. Manoj Devendra h/f Adv. Onkar Warange for Respondent No.9/.

_______________________ CORAM : KAMAL KHATA, J.

DATED : 2ND DECEMBER 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Learned Advocates for the parties submit that the parties have amicably settled their disputes and tender duly executed Consent Terms.

2.

Learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.6 and 8 submits that the Respondent No.1 to 4 and 9 are formal parties and therefore are not parties to the Consent Terms. The Appellant's Advocate also accepts this statement.

3.

The parties to the Consent Terms, who are present in Court, 1/3 Digitally signed by SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE Date:

2025.12.03 11:05:18 +0530 SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE

have been identified by the Court Sheristedar and have confirmed their signatures on the Consent Terms.

4.

The Advocates have also appended their signatures alongside those of their clients, confirming execution thereof. 5.

The parties present confirm before the Court that the Consent Terms have been executed voluntarily, of their own free will, and without any coercion or undue influence. 6.

The Consent Terms tendered are accepted and marked "X" for identification with today's date.

7.

Learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.6 and 8 clarifies that the Respondent No.7 is not a signatory but has given authority to Respondent Nos.6 and 8 to execute this Consent Terms on his behalf. The authority letter is tendered in Court and marked 'X-1' for identification with today's date.

8.

Upon perusal, the Consent Terms are found to be in order, not contrary to law, and reflective of the true intentions of the parties.

9.

I am satisfied that the terms recorded in the Consent Terms constitute a valid settlement of the commercial disputes between the parties.

10.

The representation, confirmations, and undertakings recorded in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertaking to this 2/3

Court.

11.

The Registry shall ensure that the hard copy of the signed Consent Terms is permanently retained on record and not sent for destruction in the ordinary course.

12.

Appeal from Order stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.

13.

In view of the disposal of the Appeal, Interim Application does not survive and is accordingly disposed of. (KAMAL KHATA, J.) 3/3