Motilal Gupta And ORS v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

519-WP-365-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 365 OF 2024 Motilal Gupta & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

....

Mr. Manindra Pandey a/w Ms. Aayushi Chauhan, Mr. Ajit Singh Ghorpade, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Ms. Poonam Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent No.1 - State. Suraj Gupta, Petitioner No.2 is present.

....

CORAM

:

PRAKASH D. NAIK, & N. R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

15th APRIL, 2024.

P.C.

:

1.

Not on board. Taken on Board.

2.

It is submitted that the parties have settled the dispute. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has been executed between the complainant and all other aggrieved persons. 3.

Learned A.P.P. had sought time to verify whether there are any other aggrieved persons other than those, who have signed the MOU. On instructions it is submitted that there are about 20 aggrieved persons who are party to the MOU.

Digitally signed by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

2024.04.18 14:17:23 +0530 SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Sajakali Jamadar

519-WP-365-2024.doc 4.

Learned Advocate for the Petitioners submitted that the proceedings can be quashed with the consent of complainant and all the other aggrieved persons.

5.

The complainant is represented by the Advocate. Aggrieved persons have signed the MOU.

6.

It is submitted that to enable the Petitioners to make payment to complainant and aggrieved persons, the Petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.50,00,000/- deposited by the Petitioners in this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.2034 of 2021.

7.

Since the parties have resolved the dispute. The Petitioners are permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.50,00,000/- deposited by Petitioners in this Court.

8.

To ascertain compliance, stand over to 6th May, 2024. (N. R. BORKAR, J.) (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) Sajakali Jamadar