Rishabh Rajendra Aggarwal And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

46-revn-516-2024.doc Shabnoor

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.516 OF 2024 Digitally signed by SHABNOOR AYUB PATHAN Date:

2025.09.23 19:14:24 +0530 Rishabh Rajendra Aggarwal & Ors.

... Applicants V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents SHABNOOR AYUB PATHAN None for the applicants.

Ms. Megha Bajoria, APP for the State - respondent. Mr. Sushil K. Chaurasia a/w Mohit R. Jagiasi i/b SKC Legal for respondent No.2.

CORAM

: AMIT BORKAR, J.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 23, 2025 P.C.:

1.

On perusal of the record, it is clear that the present revision application does not set out challenge to any specific judicial or quasi-judicial order. The scope of revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is confined to examination of correctness, legality, or propriety of an order passed by a subordinate Court. Unless there is a definite order against which the grievance is raised, the revisional powers cannot be invoked.

2.

In the present case, the applicant has not identified any such order. The grounds raised are general in nature and do not correspond to a concrete judicial determination capable of being tested in revision. The law is settled that a revision cannot lie in abstract; it must be directed against a particular order which

46-revn-516-2024.doc affects rights or imposes obligations.

3.

In absence of such foundation, the revision application suffers from inherent defect of maintainability. This Court cannot exercise revisional powers in vacuum or against unspecified action. Therefore, the revision application is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed.

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)