Mrs Santha Sethuraja Panicker v. State Of Maharashtra

1 of 2 10.Revn.23.2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.23 OF 2024 Mrs.Santha Sethuraja Panicker Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Siddharth Pimpale i/by PAN India Legal Services LLP for Applicant.

Mr.Arfan Sait, APP, for State.

CORAM :

PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE :

24th January 2024 PC :

1.

Learned APP submitted that the impugned order is passed by learned Special MPID Judge, Pune. Hence the Applicant has remedy of preferring an appeal challenging the said order. 2.

Section 11 of MPID Act provides that any person including the Competent Authority if aggrieved by an order of the Designated Court, may appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of the order.

3.

Thus the Applicant has to prefer an appeal u/s.11 of MPID Act. 4.

Learned advocate for Applicant submitted that Applicant may be permitted to convert the present revision application into an appeal u/s.11 of MPID Act.

MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Date: 2024.01.29 10:13:20 +0530 MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE 5.

Considering the submission, Revision Application is permitted

2 of 2 10.Revn.23.2024.doc to be converted into appeal u/s.11 of MPID Act. Requisite amendment be carried out within two weeks from today. 6.

Pursuant to amendment, the matter be placed before appropriate Bench.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) MST