← Library
Bombay High CourtAPEAL/311/2024disposed off

Kiran Viththal Vaidya v. The State Of Maharashtra

2024-08-30Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'Ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande2 pages

Digitally signed by RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL Date:

2024.09.03 15:35:33 +0530 RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL 1/2 P Apeal.871.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 871 OF 2023 Shashikant Tulshiram Khamkar ..

Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 311 OF 2024 Kiran Viththal Vaidya ..

Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 116 OF 2024 Sudhir Sahdev Shivtarkar ..

Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 125 OF 2024 Dilip Humraj Deshmukh ..

Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 117 OF 2024 Ghanshyam Sakharam Kolambe ..

Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...

Mr. Vishal V. Rankhambe, for the Appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos. 871/2023, 116/2024, 125/2024 and 117/2024. R.V.Patil

2/2 P Apeal.871.2023.odt Mr. Sandeep Karnik, for the Appellant in Appeal No. 311/2024. Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP, for the Respondent- State. ...

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED : 30th AUGUST, 2024 P.C:- 1.

A praecipe has been fled by the learned counsel for the Appellant for Speaking to the Minutes of the order dated 22.08.2024.

2.

In Sub-paragraph Nos. 2 and 3 on Page No. 4 of the said order, the following portion be corrected by substituting only the following bold numbers, as under:

"Statements of various witnesses assigning the role to the accused were recorded and in one set of witnesses, there is reference to Accused No. 1 Kiran Vaidya, whereas, there are 9 witnesses who have specifcally referred to Kishor Kondhalkar, 20 witnesses who have given reference of Ghanshyam Kolambe. As far as Shashikant Khamkar is concerned, 31 witnesses, the investors, have taken his name, as to it is on his presentation, they had invested the money. Some 28 witnesses have referred to Sudhir Shivtarkar, and Mr. Gavand, learned APP has placed before us a chart, which is prepared on the basis of the material compiled in the charge-sheet and from this chart it is evident that, each and every accused has been attributed a specifc role by either of the investor or multiple investors, who have invested the money in the scheme."

3.

The order stands corrected accordingly. The praecipe stands disposed off.

(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) R.V.Patil