Raju Sarjerao Nandre v. State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

17.APEAL-420-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.420 OF 2024 Raju Sarjerao Nandre .....Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ----- Mr. Ashish Vernekar, Advocate h/f. Mangesh B. Shirsat (appointed advocate) for the Appellant.

Ms. Shrishti Singh, Advocate h/f. Madan Gupta (appointed advocate) for the Appellant.

Mr. Prashant P. Jadhav, APP for the Respondent-State. ----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 13th JUNE, 2024 P.C. :

1.

Advocates Mr. Ashish Vernekar and Ms. Shrishti Singh appeared in the matter. Advocate Mr. Ashish Vernekar states that Mr. Mangesh Shirsat is appointed for the Appellant. Ms. Shrishti Singh states that Mr. Madan Gupta is appointed for the Appellant. Thus, there appears to be some confusion.

2.

The Legal Services Authority of this Court shall clarify this position and shall retain one of the Advocates to Deshmane(PS)

: 2 :

17.APEAL-420-24.odt represent the Appellant in this case. This shall be done within a period of ten days from today.

3.

Admit.

4.

Call record and proceedings.

5.

The appointed Advocate shall add the victim as Respondent No.2 without naming her. Amendment shall be carried out within a period of 20 days from today. 6.

After the amendment is carried out, issue notice to the added Respondent. Appointed Advocate is at liberty to prefer a separate application for bail.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) by PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date:

2024.06.14 18:30:22 +0530 PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE