Sau. Shailaja Dilip Kale v. Shri. Revansiddha Shivaji Chavan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL (PVT.) NO. 214 OF 2024 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3084 OF 2023 Sau. Shailaja Dilip Kale .....Petitioner : Versus :
Shri. Revansiddha Shivaji Chavan and anr.
....Respondents Mr. Gajendra Jadhav, for the Applicant.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : 28 NOVEMBER 2025.
P.C :
1) Motion is made for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 17 November 2025.
2) In the cause-title of the order, the words 'For Condonation of Delay' be deleted. Similarly, para-4 may be added to the order as under : "4. Registry shall return the original certified copy of the impugned order to the Applicant'.
3) The following corrections be carried out and the same be read accordingly.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] 1 of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL (PVT.) NO. 214 OF ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3084 OF 2023 Sau. Shailaja Dilip Kale .....Applicant : Versus :
Shri. Revansiddha Shivaji Chavan and anr.
....Respondents Mr. Gajendra Jadhav, for the Applicant.
Mr. Somanath Kale h/f. Mr. Susmit Phatole, for Respondent No.1. Mr. V.A. Kulkarni, APP for State.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : 17 NOVEMBER 2025.
P.C :
1) Mr. Jadhav, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant/Appellant, on instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Application and the Appeal with liberty to file Appeal under the Proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973/Section 413 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before the Sessions Court in view of judgment of the 2 of
Apex Court in Celestium Financial Versus. A. Gnanasekaran Etc.
2) Reserving the liberty as prayed for, the Application and Appeal are permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of. The Interim Appliation also stands disposed of.
3) If Appeal is filed before the Sessions Court within a period of eight weeks, the Appellant/Applicant shall be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
4) Registry shall return the original certified copy of the acquittal order to the Applicant.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Note : Corrections are carried out in cause-title and para-4 order added pursuant to speaking to minutes order dated 28 November 2025. The rest of the order remains undisturbed.
Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date:
2025.11.28 15:16:06 +0530 NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT 2025 SCC Online SC 1320 3 of