State Of Maharashtra v. Uday Shardaprasad Pathak And ORS.

14. IA 2258 of 2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2258 OF 2024 IN REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO. 23597 OF 2023 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant vs.

Uday Shardaprasad Pathak and Ors.

...Respondents

***** Mr. H. J. Dedhia APP for the Applicant-State Adv. Prashant Pandey a/w Ashok Dhanuka, Dinesh Jadhwani, Irfan Unwala i/by W3Legal LLP Advocate for the Respondent Uday Pathak Respondent No. 1 present in-person ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE : 18th JUNE 2024 P. C. :- 1.

Heard learned APP and learned Advocate for Respondent No. 1. 2.

The impugned order came to be passed on 19/08/2023. There is delay of 24 days. It is opposed on behalf of the Respondent No. 1. 3.

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. Let revision be registered.

Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2024.06.20 14:01:57 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 1/2

14. IA 2258 of 2024.doc 4.

There is also submission that co-accused have been joined as Respondent Nos. 2 to 14. Whereas submission was made on 05/03/2024 by learned APP that the Order came to be passed on an application moved by Respondent No. 1 only. That is why notice was issued to Respondent No. 1 only.

5.

Interim Application No. 2258 of 2024 is disposed of. REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO. 23597 OF 2023 6.

Respondent No. 1 seeks time to file a reply. He can do so. Copy be served on learned APP. During hearing if this Court finds that other Respondent needs to be heard then Court will issue notice to them. 7.

Matter be kept 02nd July 2024.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2