India Photo Studio By Vimal Jethalal Thakker v. Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority

61-WP-567-2024.DOCX Darshan Patil

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 567 OF 2024 India Photo Studio and Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Ors.

...Respondents

WITH REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 11219 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 7169 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 567 OF 2024 Adv Akansha Patil, i/b Narayanan & Narayanan, for the Petitioners. Dr Abhinav Chandrachud, a/w K Tiwari and Mahesh Pandey, for Respondent No.4.

Mr P G Lad, a/w Adv Sayli Apte, for the Respondent-MHADA.

CORAM

M.S. Sonak & Kamal Khata, JJ.

DATED:

26 August 2024 PC:- 1.

At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners stand over to 02 September 2024.

26 August 2024

61-WP-567-2024.DOCX 2.

However, we clarify that no further request for adjournment on behalf of the petitioners will be entertained because Dr. Chandrachud, learned counsel for respondent No.4, points out that the 4th respondent/developer is paying transit rents to the occupants/tenants who have already vacated the premises. (Kamal Khata, J) (M.S. Sonak, J) Signed by: Darshan Patil Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 28/08/2024 10:47:49 26 August 2024