Prabha Atmaram Anande v. The State Of Maharashtra By Government Pleader

37.WP.719-2024.DOCX Pradnya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 719 OF 2024 Prabha Atmaram Anande and ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

...Respondents

Mr Omar Khaiyam Shaikh, a/w Mr Mohd. Faraaz Shaikh, for the Petitioners.

Ms Sheetal Malvankar, AGP, for the Respondent-State. Ms Madhavi Ayyappan, i/b. Talekar and Associates, for the Respondent-MHADA.

CORAM

M.S. Sonak & Kamal Khata, JJ.

DATED:

23rd September 2024 PC:- 1.

The 5th Respondent (Developer) has served a copy of the reply on the learned counsel for the Petitioners. However, neither the 5th Respondent nor his advocate are present. 2.

List the matter on 14 October 2024.

3.

If the 5th Respondent or his advocate do not appear, we will proceed with this matter because learned counsel for the Petitioners states that the 5th Respondent has not paid arrears

37.WP.719-2024.DOCX of transit rent and by filing a reply, he is now trying to avoid such payment.

(Kamal Khata, J) (M.S. Sonak, J) Signed by: Pradnya Bhogale Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 24/09/2024 11:59:28