Prabha Atmaram Anande v. The State Of Maharashtra By Government Pleader

46-WP719-24.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

JYOTI RAJESH MANE ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2025.11.26 18:04:57 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 719 OF 2024 Prabha Atmaram Anande & Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra By Government Pleader & Ors.

...Respondents

_______ Mr. Omar Khaiyam Shaikh a/w. Mr. Sahil Salvi, for the Petitioner. Mr. Prashant Kamble, AGP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. P.G.Lad a/w. Ms. Sayali Apte, for Respondent No.2/MHADA. Mr. Duj Jain i/b. Vinayak Siraskar, for Respondent No.5. _______

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.

DATE:

24th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C.

1.

Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, Owners of the Property in question are not before the Court.

2.

Let notice be issued by the Advocate for the Petitioner to the Advocate representing Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, before the adjourned date of hearing. In the meantime, learned counsel for the Respondent No.5 - Developers states that no steps have been taken to put the building on Sale by his client. We accept the statement .

3.

Learned counsel for MHADA has already filed a reply affidavit wherein MHADA has made it clear that now NOC issued in favour of the Mane

46-WP719-24.DOC owners/Respondent No.5 be cancelled and steps will be taken to acquire the building.

4.

Let the correct position as on date be placed on record on behalf of MHADA so that we can pass further appropriate orders. 5.

List the proceedings on 3rd December 2025. HOB. (AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Mane