Kamal Sevakram Jadhawani v. State Of Maharashtra

ssm 11-wp3865.2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3865 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.26020 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.20746 OF 2024 K. S. Chamankar Enterprises .....Petitioner Vs.

The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.

.....Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 747 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.20688 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.17624 OF 2024 Kamal Sevakram Jadhawani .....Petitioner Vs.

The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.

.....Respondents ___________________________________________ Mr. Ashish Kamat, Senior Advocate a/w. Adv. Akshay Patil, Adv. Ish Jain, Adv. Kiran Jain, Adv. Duj Jain, Adv. Vinayak Siraskar and Adv. Nayan Bhalekar i/by Kiran Jain & Co. for the Petitioner in WP No.3865 of 2024 and for the Respondent No.4 in WP No.747 of 2024. Mr. Rohan Sawant a/w. Ms. Gauri Joshi i/by Ganesh & Co. for the Petitioner in WP No.747 of 2024 and for the Respondent Nos.4 and 5 in WP No.3865 of 2024.

Mr. Aspi Chinoy, Senior Advocate a/w Adv. Shardul Singh, Adv. Prerna 1/2

ssm 11-wp3865.2024.doc Gandhi, Adv. Sayali Sawant and Adv. Anish Shahapurkar for the Respondent No.3 in WP No.3865 of 2024.

Mr. Chetan Kapadia, Senior Advocate a/w Adv. M.S. Shraddha Achaliya, Adv.Sunil Gangan and Adv. S.M. Segarla i/by RMG Law Associates for the Respondent Nos. 3 in WP No.747 of 2024.

Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w Adv. Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy) for the Respondent No.2 in WP Nos.747 of 2024.

Mr. Dipesh Siroya, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP No.3865 of 2024. Adv. Gaurangi Patil, AGP for the Respondent-State in WP No.747 of 2024. ___________________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND P. S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.

DATE : 25th OCTOBER, 2024.

P.C.:- 1) Mr. Chinoy, learned senior counsel appearing for the Respondent No.3 on instructions submitted that, on 24th October, 2024, remaining suit structure is pulled down by his client. 2) Mr. Kamat, learned senior counsel for the Petitioners contradicts the same.

3) Mr. Chinoy, learned senior counsel for the Respondent No.3 submitted that, as of today there are debris of demolished structure at the site and till the Petition is heard after re-opening of the Court, the Respondent No.3 will remove it. That, in case the Petitioners succeed in the Petitions, the Respondent No.3 will not claim any equity in the matters. 4) Stand over to 27th November, 2024 at 2.30 p.m. (P. S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2 by SANJIV SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR Date:

2024.10.25 18:38:15 +0530 SANJIV SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR