Shobhnath Ramchandra Singh v. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Mmrda

HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV H.C. SHIV 29.w908.24.doc HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2026.03.17 11:13:01 +0300

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.908 OF 2024 Shobhnath Ramchandra Singh ... Petitioner Vs.

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority & Ors.

... Respondents ____________________________________ Mr. K. H. Giri with Pratik Yadav with Prachi Gupta and Dhavan Giri for the Petitioner.

Ms. Aparna Vhatkar with Ms. Mitalee Gaikwad for Respondent No.1. Mr. Kamlesh Mali i/b Meena Kshirsagar and Associates for Respondent No.2.

Mr. Pandit Togare, CDO, and Mr. Mangesh Gaikwad, ALM, MMRDA present. _____________________________________ CORAM : SUMAN SHYAM & SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

DATED : 13th MARCH, 2026 P.C. :- 1) Having heard the submissions made at the bar, we direct Ms.Vhatkar, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to seek instructions and apprise this Court as to whether any suitable offer can be made to the Petitioner by Respondent No.1 even at this stage, so as to redress his grievance. This, we say so because the basic contention of the Petitioner in the Writ Petition is not denied and disputed by the Respondent No.1. 2) List the matter again on 10th April, 2026 so as to enable the learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to seek instructions. 3) Ad-interim order, if any, granted earlier, to continue. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) 1/1