← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2396/2024disposed off

Annie Abraham Patani v. State Of Maharashtra Department Of Revenue

2025-03-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla2 pages

908-wp-2396-2024.doc jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JITENDRA SHANKAR NIJASURE WRIT PETITION NO.2396 OF 2024 JITENDRA SHANKAR NIJASURE Date: 2025.03.27 16:29:28 +0530 Annie Abraham Patani

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

---------- Mr. Rahul Soman, Ms. Soniya Putta, Mr. Apoorv Karekar and Ms. Souparnika S. i/b. M/s. Solomon and Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate, Ms. Shradha Achliya, Mr. Amit Patil, (Thru V.C.), Mr. Rishabh Jadhav and Ms. Purva Naik i/b. Parinam Law Associates for Respondent No.6.

Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. GP with Mr. Manish Upadhye, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 5.

---------- CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA J.

DATE : 25TH MARCH, 2025.

ORDER :

1.

The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner after having argued the Petition and contending that the Petitioner is aggrieved in particular by the second paragraph of the operative Order by which her name has been removed from the property card inspite of the Petitioner being the owner of land admeasuring 166.41 1/2

908-wp-2396-2024.doc Sq. mtrs., which is undisputed, has sought leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty granted to the Petitioner to adjudicate her rights and contentions raised in the Writ Petition before the appropriate forum.

2.

In view thereof, the Writ Petition No.2396 of 2024 is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 3.

The rights and contentions of the Petitioner and Respondents in the Writ Petition are kept open to be raised before the appropriate forum.

4.

The proceedings preferred by the Petitioner pursuant to the liberty granted by this Order shall be decided by the appropriate forum on its own merits and in accordance with law. [ R.I. CHAGLA J. ] 2/2