Mariam Shujauddin Shaikh v. Slum Rehabilitation Authority Through Its Chief Executive Officer

901.WP.4992.2024.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4992 OF 2024 Mariam Shujauddin Shaikh and another Petitioners

Versus

The SRA through its CEO and others Respondents _______ Mr.Akash Bhogil i/by Mr.Altak Khan for Petitioner. Mr.Yogesh Vijay Patil i/by Mr.Abhijit M.Patil for SRA. Ms.Rita Joshi,AGP for Respondent State.

Mr.Rishikesh Soni with Mr.S.M.Seegarla, Advocate for Respondent no.4. _______

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.

DATE:

3rd October 2025 P.C.

1.

Learned counsel for the Petitioners and Respondent no.4 developer on the backdrop of the previous hearings are before the Court to contend that consent terms dated 1st October 2025 are entered between their respective clients, in terms of which they state that the disputes between the Petitioners and Respondent no.4 stand resolved. The consent terms are signed by the Petitioners as also the authorized signatory of Respondent no.4 (Director Akhilesh Pandey). We are informed that Petitioner no.2 is present in the Court. The consent terms are also signed by the respective advocates. There is no dispute as to the signatures of the parties, which are identified by their respective advocates. MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Date: 2025.10.07 18:12:39 +0530 2.

The consent terms are accordingly taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

Manish Thatte

901.WP.4992.2024.DOC 3.

We dispose of this petition in terms of the consent terms. Undertakings as set out stand accepted. No costs.

(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Manish Thatte