Manish Amrutlal Nakar v. Bhaniben Chhaganbhai Nakar (Deceased)

Before : Sachin B. Bhansali, Prothonotary & Senior Master Date : 06th August, 2024 FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL :

CHOL/329/2024 in TPL/23959/2021 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Ms. Leela Ranga a/w. Arti Dharamsi, Advocate for the applicant.

P.C.:

The present Chamber Order is e-filed by the applicant for setting aside Order dated 13.07.2023, rejecting captioned petition under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections.

Heard ld. Advocate for the applicant. Perused Affidavit of the applicant. It is contended that due to inadvertence, office objections could not be removed within given time. It is further contended that due to inadvertence of earlier Advocate, approximately one month delay was caused in filing present Chamber Order, which was not intentional and prayed for condonation of delay. Ld. Advocate for the applicant made a statement that as on date, captioned petition is uncontested. Statement is accepted.

Considering ground raised, on oath, by the applicant and Statement made by ld. Advocate for the applicant, as above, in the interest of justice, one month delay, caused in filing present Chamber Order, is condoned and the present Chamber Order is granted as prayed.

The petitioner to remove office objections on the petition and get the same registered and/or numbered within two weeks from the date of uploading of order, failing petition to stand rejected for non-compliance of O.S.Rule 986.

Date : 06.08.2024 Prothonotary and Senior Master by RAJEEV VIJAY ACHARYA Date:

2024.08.06 17:10:24 +0530 RAJEEV VIJAY ACHARYA