Aic246 Ag And Co Kg v. The Patent Office Of India Through Controller General Of Patents, Designs And Trade Marks

1/2 P4-COMMP-72-2025.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 72 OF 2025 AIC 246 AG & CO. KG

...Petitioner

Versus

The Patent Office of India & Ors.

...Respondents

_______ Mr. Dhiren Karamia i/b. Khaitan & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr. Rishi Mody a/w. Ms. Archi Gala, for Respondent No.3. _______ CORAM :

ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

th MARCH, 2026 DATE :

P.C.

1.

Mentioned. Not on board. Taken on board for Speaking to the Minutes of th February 2026.

the Judgment dated 27 2.

Mr. Mody, learned counsel for Respondent No. 3 points out that, the heading on page no. 14 which reads "Respondent's Submissions" be corrected as "Submissions by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2".

3.

He also submits that in paragraph no. 28D, the sentence "The stand taken by Respondents.." be corrected as "The stand taken by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.." 4.

Mr. Karamia, learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that in paragraph no. 1 the title of the invention is incorrectly mentioned as 'Combinations Comprising a Triazole Fungicide and a Biological Control Agent' instead of 'Amorphous Letermovir and Solid Pharmaceutical Formulations thereof for Oral Administration';

Vaibhav

2/2 P4-COMMP-72-2025.DOC 5.

He also points out that the decision of Abraxis Bioscience LLC v. Union of India referred to in paragraph 15 is a decision of Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) and not of Delhi High Court.

6.

The Judgment be corrected accordingly.

[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Vaibhav