Dhirendra Phadte And 4 ORS v. Tarun Radhakrishin Tahilani And 8 ORS

WP(F) 2795 of 2023 Niti

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.2795 OF 2023 (F) DHIRENDRA PHADTE AND 4 ORS ... PETITIONERS

Versus

TARUN RADHAKRISHIN TAHILANI AND 8 ORS ... RESPONDENTS Mr C.A. Fereira with Mr Richard Almeida and Mr V. Braganza, Advocates for the Petitioners.

Mr Nitin Sardessai, Senior Advocate with Mr Raunaq Rao, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

Mr D. Pangam, Advocate General with Mr P. Arolkar, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent - State. Mr S.D. Padiyar with Mr P. Shirodkar, Advocate for Respondent No.5.

CORAM:- M. S. SONAK & VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.

DATED :- 12th December, 2023 P.C.:

The learned Advocate General for the State, Mr Sardessai for the first respondent and Mr Padiyar for the fifth respondent seek two weeks time to file a reply. They say that advance copies will be supplied to the learned Counsel for the petitioners.

2. Accordingly, we post this matter for further consideration on 17.01.2024. The construction which the first respondent is carrying on shall be done at the risk and consequences of the first respondent. This 12th December, 2023

WP(F) 2795 of 2023 means that the first respondent will not claim any equities.

3. After the replies are filed, the petitioners' prayer for interim relief would be taken up for consideration.

4. Considering the averments in paras 1 and 2, the petitioners will have to take necessary steps to comply with the PIL Rules. Accordingly, leave is granted to amend the petition. The amendment should be carried out within two weeks. Mr Fereira states that office objections will be cleared within two weeks from the receipt of the amended copy of the petition.

VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.

M. S. SONAK, J.

NITI K HALDANKAR Date: 2023.12.13 12:08:05 +05'30'

NITI K HALDANKAR 12th December, 2023