Sayyad Shafi Amed Azgar Ali v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its District Collector And Others

908- W.P. No. 736-2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 736 OF 2024 SAYYAD SHAFI AHMED AZGAR ALI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS ....

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh A. Bhadgaonkar AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. A. S. Shinde Advocate for respondent No.5 : Mr. S. G. Munde ....

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 14.02.2024 PER COURT :

1.

This Court is getting new experiences daily. The primary rule of circulation is to intimate the other side. However, in many cases, the lawyer seeks circulation and pray for the order without intimating the other side.

2.

In this case, the petitioner is also seeking an order against the order of the Collector for staying the election. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner did not intimate the contesting respondent, and he is praying for the order without intimating counsel for the contesting respondent.

908- W.P. No. 736-2024.odt 3.

There should be a fairness. No one should try to obtain the order without the knowledge of the other side. It is more than negligence. Hence, remove this matter from the board and list the matter on a fixed date.

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE ysk