Rahul Ranjan v. The Vasai Virar City Municipal Corporation Thr Its Commissioner And ORS

Laxmi 78 wp 1190-25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE WRIT PETITION NO. 1190 OF 2025 LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2025.04.24 14:24:51 +0530 Rahul Ranjan ... Petitioner.

V/s.

The Vasai Virar City Municipal Corporation & Ors. ... Respondents.

Mr. Vinod Sangvikar for the Petitioner.

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ.

DATE : 17th April, 2025.

P.C.:- 1) Heard Mr. Sangvikar, learned Advocate for the Petitioner. 2) Record indicates that Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are duly served. Despite service, none appears for the concerned Respondents. 2.1) Record further indicates that the Respondent-Corporation has already issued Notice under Sections 52, 53 and 54 of the MRTP Act, 1966 to the occupants of Respondent No.4-Society.

3) In view thereof, we direct Respondent No.3 to ensure the compliance of the said notices.

4) The Petition is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clauses (c) and (d).

(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1