Nandkumar Narayanrao Sakharkar v. The State Bank Of India Branch Apmc Nanded

911, 912 - WP-2774, 2784-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 WRIT PETITION NO. 2774 OF 2024 MOHINI SATISH SARSAR

VERSUS

THE STATE BANK OF INDIA BRANCH APMC NANDED AND 912 WRIT PETITION NO. 2784 OF 2024 NANDKUMAR NARAYANRAO SAKHARKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE BANK OF INDIA BRANCH APMC NANDED ....

Mr. K. A. Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. R. C. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. N. S. Tekale, Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGPs for Respondent - State ....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 06.09.2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Despite the respondent Bank has been served in March 2024, the affidavit-in-reply is not yet filed. The matter was on board on several dates, as we seen from the farad-sheet. Now a request is made for four weeks time. We decline to grant four weeks. Let the affidavit-in-reply on behalf of the Bank be filed, on or before 20.09.2024.

(( 2 )) 911, 912 - WP-2774, 2784-24 2.

List both the Petitions in the 'fresh admissions category', on 24.09.2024.

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ] SMS