Sumayya Tasneem Farheen Md Akbar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Others

(1) 912-914-922.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3158 OF 2024 SYED KAMRAN ADIL SYED MUMTAZ ALI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 3163 OF 2024 SUMAYYA TASNEEM FARHEEN MD AKBAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 3177 OF 2024 PATHAN MAJEDKHAN RAJAKKHAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Smt. Anjali Dube, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. P. S. Patil, Addl. GP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. ...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

DATED : 22nd MARCH, 2024.

P.C.

1.

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents. The learned A.G.P. waives notice for respondent nos.1 to 3. Notice of respondent no.4 is made returnable on 04.04.2024.

(2) 912-914-922.odt 3.

Taking into consideration the order passed by this Court in earlier Writ Petitions i.e. Writ Petition Nos.11351/2023, 10302/2023 and 9799/2023 respectively and the impugned order passed by the then respondent no.3, we direct the then respondent no.3 to remain present on the next date with his reply.

4.

Till the next date, no coercive action be taken against the petitioners on the basis of the impugned order passed by the then respondent no.3.

(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/March-2024