← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5192/2024transfer to other court

Rajlaxmi Panditrao Jamsandekar Thr Poa Vijay Atmaram Yadav v. Rasmina Construction Pvt. Ltd. And ANR

2025-03-17Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5192 OF 2024 Rajlaxmi Panditrao Jamsandekar Through POA holder Shri. Vijay Atmaram Yadav ....Petitioner versus Rasmina Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

....Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kshirsagar a/w Mr. Rahul Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner.

None for the Respondents.

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE : 17th MARCH, 2025 P.C. :- 1.

Mentioned at 5.00 p.m. by Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kshirsagar.

2.

Heard learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner.

3.

Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 28th September, 2021 passed by 11th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Kolhapur in Miscellaneous Application No.100 of 2020 by which the learned Civil Judge has condoned a delay of 9 years and 5 days caused in filing restoration application of Regular Civil Suit (RCS) No.881 of 1999. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that Respondent No.1 had failed to make out any cause, much less, any sufficient cause to seek indulgence of the Court to condone such an enormous delay of 9 years and 5 days. 4.

Learned Advocate for the Petitioner points out Paragraph No.13 in the petition memo for the delay caused in approaching this Court against the impugned order dated 28th September, 2021.

5.

Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 15th April, 2025.

6.

In addition to the regular mode, Petitioner to take steps to serve the Respondents by all permissible modes including private service and file an affidavit of service before the next date of

hearing.

7.

Stand Over to 15th April, 2025.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)