Sachin Gopinath Kulkarni v. Siddhakala Co-Op Hsg Society Throu. Chairman Abhijeet Vichare
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5450 OF 2024 Sachin Gopinath Kulkarni
...Petitioner
Versus
Siddhakala Co-op. Housing Society Through Chairman/Secretary Treasurer Abhijeet Vikhare (Chairman)
...Respondent
------ Mr. Kulkarni Kiran i/by D. Jain for the Petitioner. -------
CORAM
:
AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.
DATE :
19th JULY 2024 P.C.
:
1.
Heard Mr. Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.
The petition questions the order dated 18.11.2019 passed by the Judge Co-operative Court Thane by which it has been held, that the application under Section 340 r/w Section 195 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) and Section 209 of SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Indian Penal Code (IPC) would be decided after recording by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date: 2024.07.19 14:44:20 +0530 evidence as the contention as to whether the disputant has made a false and vague statement is a matter of evidence, the position in the dispute, being that the matter is pending for hearing of
Exhibit-5. It is stated at the bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Exhibit-5 has thereafter being not pressed by the learned counsel for the original disputant. The challenge is to this order dated 18.11.2019 by the petitioner has been rejected by Judgment dated 09.08.2020, wherein is has been opined that upon a preliminary inquiry, the learned Appellate Court was of the opinion that it was not a fit case in which, a compliant should be lodged under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. as prima facie there was no material to indicate that disputant had committed an offence under Section 195 of Cr.P.C. in judicial proceedings before the Co-operative Court by making false statement on oath (Page81).
The question, as to whether indeed, a false statement on oath has been made or not is for the learned Co-operative Court to decide based upon the material produced before it. When it opines, that the material produced before it would require evidence to be recorded, that is an opinion rendered by the Court of first instance, which has been confirmed by the Appellate Court, which finding, ought not be interfered by this Court, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
operative Court and Judgment of the learned Co-operative Appellate Court. The petition is therefore dismissed. No costs. (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)